<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stethoscope Immunity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pissypollyanna.com/2007/10/30/stethoscope-immunity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pissypollyanna.com/2007/10/30/stethoscope-immunity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:50:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Sharzer</title>
		<link>http://www.pissypollyanna.com/2007/10/30/stethoscope-immunity/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Sharzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pissypollyanna.com/2007/10/30/stethoscope-immunity/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>I thought I should correct a couple of factual mistakes in my comment. Dr Tom Eberhard has an office at 1292 Highbury Ave., not 1492, and the other Dr Eberhard in London,, who I&#039;ve never met, does not have the first name Tom. He practises internal medicine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I should correct a couple of factual mistakes in my comment. Dr Tom Eberhard has an office at 1292 Highbury Ave., not 1492, and the other Dr Eberhard in London,, who I&#8217;ve never met, does not have the first name Tom. He practises internal medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Sharzer</title>
		<link>http://www.pissypollyanna.com/2007/10/30/stethoscope-immunity/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Sharzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pissypollyanna.com/2007/10/30/stethoscope-immunity/#comment-464</guid>
		<description>I came across your site by accident, and found it reassuring and disturbing at the same time. I would like to add another name to this list, Dr Tom Eberhard. A family physician in London, Ontario, with an (unmarked) office at 1492 Highbury Ave. (He should not be confused with another Dr Tom Eberhard in London,  a specialist.) I made a complaint to the College after he caressed my breast, and, on an earlier occasion, made some inappropriate comments. After a lengthy process, they decided not to proceed because he denied it, and one of his assistants claimed to have been present at all times (she was not); they stated that although they don&#039;t question the veracity of the claim, they had to question the ability to prove the case!
     I have been confounded at what avenues are left to protect the public from this man. I have considered an entry in Rate MDs, but a quick check shows a &#039;good rating&#039; for Dr Dobrowolski, with a brief mention of controversy. 
       I was not aware of the information I read above, although, unfortunately,  I am not surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across your site by accident, and found it reassuring and disturbing at the same time. I would like to add another name to this list, Dr Tom Eberhard. A family physician in London, Ontario, with an (unmarked) office at 1492 Highbury Ave. (He should not be confused with another Dr Tom Eberhard in London,  a specialist.) I made a complaint to the College after he caressed my breast, and, on an earlier occasion, made some inappropriate comments. After a lengthy process, they decided not to proceed because he denied it, and one of his assistants claimed to have been present at all times (she was not); they stated that although they don&#8217;t question the veracity of the claim, they had to question the ability to prove the case!<br />
     I have been confounded at what avenues are left to protect the public from this man. I have considered an entry in Rate MDs, but a quick check shows a &#8216;good rating&#8217; for Dr Dobrowolski, with a brief mention of controversy.<br />
       I was not aware of the information I read above, although, unfortunately,  I am not surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
